https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6176
--- Comment #18 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2009-12-22 03:02:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created an attachment (id=4613) --> (https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4613) [details] > proposed patch, take 2 > > Apparently nobody is brave enough to touch the spamc.conf, so I'm > reluctantly doing it. Also fixed a buffer overflow when there > are more than 24 arguments present (command line + from a config file), > and fixed one spelling. I hate to be annoying, but IMO it's critical that we come up with a .t script to exercise the failure case found in rc1.proposed1. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
