https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6265
--- Comment #13 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2010-01-07 14:57:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Honestly, don't think its a good idea to enable sa-update by default. Dunno > > what others think....especially the ones supplying the sa-update > > infrastructure. > > I think it's a good idea but I *thought* sa-update checked DNS for the > availability of an update not an http query. > KAM yep it does. I'm quite happy to see sa-update enabled by default, to be honest; if we need more mirrors, we need more mirrors, and that's easily done. in the meantime sa-update will do the right thing, retry where necessary, etc. at some point we should do the "random offset from hour" thing ourselves, but the right way (as per my coworker Colm): http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2009/09/14/period-pain/ http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2009/09/27/period-pain-part-2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
