Fyi it's a holiday weekend in the US. Using lazy concensus now might be better done starting sunday or monday.
--- Original Message --- From:Justin Mason <[email protected]> Sent:Fri 1/15/10 3:45 pm To:Warren Togami <[email protected]> Cc:Justin Mason <[email protected]>,SpamAssassin Dev <[email protected]> Subj:Re: PROPOSED 3.3.0-rc3 On Friday, January 15, 2010, Warren Togami <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/15/2010 11:13 AM, Warren Togami wrote: > > > -1 > > Even though my rc3 was unofficial, it is entirely uncool from packager > perspective to reuse names. Names are meaningless and cheap. This should > have been named rc4. > > Furthermore I am unconvinced that we should change the "use bytes" thing > at this last minute. It has been going on since early 3.2.x and we're > fixing it only at the last moment before 3.3.0? This seems unsafe. > > Could someone provide a sample message that takes an obscene amount of > time? > > Warren > > > Furthermore, what is releasing an official rc3 at this point going to gain > us, especially if it will take 3 days to become an official release? BTW I think I need to clarify. ANY release will take 3 days from tarball cutting to become an official release -- 72 hours to provide time for -1 votes. That is ASF protocol on releases. -- --j.
