On 01/24/2010 05:47 AM, Kevin Golding wrote:
In article<[email protected]>, Warren Togami <[email protected]> writesWe can use any ham, even without accompanying spam. The more variety of sources of ham the better.Just to clarify, I'm offering to run a nightly masscheck locally, I'll never get permission to send this stuff elsewhere. Would I be better running without any spam corpus or a crippled one that can be ignored later? Kevin
You can do either. Warren
