https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6312
Adam Katz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2010-02-01 08:19:29 UTC --- Yeah, as noted earlier, my perl isn't as hot as some of the other things I do. I just find it odd to use a ternary operator with empty clauses, especially if the empty clause is the first one. Better to use 'if(!...)' except for the note below. Perhaps my assumptions of perl's short-circuiting nature is incorrect, but I was under the impression something like 'true && false && undef' wouldn't be a problem because it would stop everything once you get the false clause. As to the statement standing within an expression ... again, my green perl nature shines. I guess that's why it was ternary, so as to avoid the extra curly brackets and/or a 'do' stanza? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
