https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Adam Katz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2010-02-09 11:14:38 UTC --- Probably one of the faults of using a genetic algorithm; too many generations will produce a little inbreeding and some unexpected results on a few children, too few generations will produce something immature. I think it makes perfect sense that something like this, which hits almost no messages, fell through the cracks. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100208-r907584-n/FH_HAS_XID/detail MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 0 0.0060 0.0042 0.586 0.50 3.30 FH_HAS_XID As to how the automated processes even keep it in the published ruleset (let alone evade the hand-set score), that's a different puzzle. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
