https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6297
--- Comment #12 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[email protected]> 2010-02-24 01:58:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > nopublish rules for online updates that involve network traffic are > particularly bad. The current UPDATE version 912513 contains 22 nopublish > rules, 14 of which are net rules -- including new DNSBLs like Ick. I wasn't aware of this. I saw a couple of comments via email that said "I fixed this" but it appears that it wasn't fixed, just worked around for a single day. > T_RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM that result in additional DNS traffic. Perhaps the > recommendation should be for sa-update to be disabled until this bug is fixed. No, please don't promote that people should disable sa-update. If people do, we won't be able to get the rules revoked by a subsequent update. I'm looking into this now. > As a large site, we keep external DNS traffic to an absolute minimum and rely > on DNSBLs that are served up locally via rbldnsd to keep reasonable scantimes > and not flood unsuspecting DNSBLs. Hmm. I'm not yet sure how to best handle this. We want to be able to push out new DNSBLs via updates, but I completely understand (and live) your situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
