https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6338
--- Comment #9 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2010-03-02 00:42:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Does anybody feel we need to lift the requirement for an exact (case-for-case) > match when dns0x20 option is NOT enabled? Some poor soul on a cheap home > router/firewall/dns-server may be affected by this without knowing why > his SA DNS queries sometimes fail. Are you talking about a DNS server responding with a canonicalized, all lower case version? Anyway, the "cheap home router" scenario is exactly what's most likely to fail ALWAYS for large DNS BLs, as apposed to "sometimes" due to response mis-match -- the DHCP assigned forwarder ISP's DNS is most likely to be blacklisted by major DNS BLs, and that user won't get any hits for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
