On Sunday, March 7, 2010, 1:31:22 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > No -- if it's ham, it's ham! Thanks.
+1 Jeff C. > On Sunday, March 7, 2010, John Hardin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Justin Mason wrote: >> >> >> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100306-r919715-n/URIBL_DBL/detail#all >> >> it looks good except for the jhardin corpus, which has a comparatively >> high FP rate. looking at the logs they all seem to contain other >> strong spam signs... could you check them? >> >> >> The "alerts" corpus is all political newsletters. >> >> I've had problems before with these newsletters hitting URIBL because some >> of the organizations sending them don't bother to set up a proper website >> for the domain name that's sending the messages. Their subscription >> confirmation practices may also be somewhat iffy, which may be why they got >> listed on DBL. >> >> I'm trying to work with them to clean up their practices. I am willing to >> temporarily remove this corpus until they drop off DBL, but I'm reluctant to >> remove it permanently. >>
