On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:34, Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24/03/2010 11:24, Justin Mason wrote: >> [ccing Mark] >> >> Mark, we are discussing a recent bugzilla issue -- I attempted to move >> all bugs on the 3.3.1 target milestone to 3.3.2, and in the process >> put them all into the Security group. this is the second time I've >> done this ;) > > I noticed :) - I'm on [email protected] that gets copies of all > [email protected] mail. > >> 2010/3/24 Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]>: >>> If my suspicion is correct, not so much UI but logic. Unless you >>> actually changed anything relevant, I suspect the "don't change group >>> restriction" at the bottom to Security, if any is in that group, or >>> maybe a missing "reset assignee", which shouldn't need to be explicitly >>> set either. Don't feel like testing this and generating even more bug >>> mail, though. >> >> Yep, I explicitly made sure to choose the "don't change group restriction" >> option for the Security group, and "--do_not_change--" for Components. >> But it still modified the groups. :( >> >> I think this is a Bugzilla bug. Quoting an old mail: >> >> ] This is according to the changes by Mark Thomas, sent to the private >> ] list on Jun 07, 2009. To quote from his post: >> ] >> ] I also made a change to the way the security related bugs are handled. >> ] When a bug is edited if any of the following are true: >> ] - component == security >> ] - groups include == security >> ] then >> ] - component is set to security >> ] - group is set to security >> ] - assignee is set to [email protected] >> >> So it sounds like, when the "Change Several Bugs At Once" option is >> used, if _any_ of the bugs qualify for the above condition, _all_ >> of the bugs are modified accordingly. That's not desirable. ;) >> Mark, is that possible? > > The same thought occurred to me. I'll do some checking. It'll take a > little while as I don't want to test this on the live system. I'll need > to take backup of the data, copy to my local machine, setup bugzilla > etc, etc. > > On the assumption you won't need to do this again for a few weeks, I'll > try and get answer for you by the end of the month.
thanks dude, that's perfect. I doubt we'll have a release by then ;) -- --j.
