https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6397

Adam Katz <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #2 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2010-04-12 18:54:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Problem:  these rules almost always score together, which sums to a really
> > high score with network checks enabled (3.950 or 5.132 with Bayes).
> > 
> > We can remove TWO_IPS_RCVD since it performs slightly worse, [...]
> 
> If this is your opinion about your own rule, why not simply remove or
> tflags nopublish it?

The part you truncated contained my logic and asked if it was worthwhile:
> > We can remove TWO_IPS_RCVD since it performs slightly worse, or we can
> > remove RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH since that would enable shrinking the eval
> > code.

If this is not considered worthwhile, I'll remove my rule.


Also note this is a bug in the GA, which apparently fails to notice (and/or
account for) such overwhelming overlap, bringing up the question of whether it
should be specifically sought out rather than depending on inter-generational
differences.  (This would change this bug's Component category to RuleQA or
Score Generation.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to