https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6377
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #4714|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-06-04 09:29:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=4770) --> (https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4770) Mostly stylistic changes to the proposed patch trunk: Bug 6377: win32: spamd signal handling Sending spamd/spamd.raw Committed revision 951403. Apart from some minor stylistic changes to the proposed patch, I added status checking and reporting (info) on sending SIGINT, and one change at around line 1006 in spamd.raw, on which I have a question (for Unix people, not for Daniel/Windows): is there any reason not to call child_handler() unconditionally, even if $scaling is true and the machine is not running Windows? If there are no processes to be reaped, the waitpid bails out immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
