https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6444
--- Comment #18 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-06-15 16:19:14 EDT --- Bradley, did you have a chance of trying my proposed patch instead of yours? Considering that it doesn't use the IN operator in SQL it should behave much like yours, while factoring out invariant code. If it doesn't work too well in your case due to transactional locking, you can try moving the calls to begin_work() and commit() to within the 'for' loop. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
