https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6508
--- Comment #2 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[email protected]> 2010-11-04 18:00:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Now, there is one caveat with using a Patricia trie for lookups: > it finds the tightest match on listed CIDR networks - unlike our > present sequential search, which returns the first match in the > order of declared networks. For all practical purposes on valid > data this makes no difference. The difference pops up on overlapping > conflicting networks. In my experience this has been an important feature. I know of a number of people that have setups like this: trusted_networks 10.20.30.0/24 internal_networks 10.20.30.0/24 !10.20.30.2/31 Where the /24 covers their MXes and the /31 covers their MSAs. I suppose that msa_networks solves this particular problem (I think) but I don't know what the uptake of msa_networks has been like... lots of people got things working long before I came up with msa_networks. I think I'd lean towards only using Net::Patricia if there are no "!" entires, or optionally. Daryl -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
