https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6511
--- Comment #6 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2010-11-06 16:29:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1. Did this problem actually cause some sort of damage, beyond triggering a > restart (that would have happened if there was an update anyway)? Not an authoritative answer, which only Jeremy could provide, but... It is my understanding there actually was *no* unnecessary restart, but a restart due to an exit code 0, success -- warranted. Comment 0 shows two incidents, both with different channel version numbers. And in comment 2 Jeremy points out after digging through the code, that after the first mirror failing, sa-update fell back to the next one, grabbed the updated rules tarball, and correctly exited with 0. This of course assumes there's been only one such incident per channel version number. Jeremy, is that correct? No mention of both mirrors failing. And if there would not have been an update, the process would have stopped right after the DNS query, never even attempting to get to a mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
