I'm +1 for mailspike being in a release. I'm also a nameserver for it and have been tweaking the cf file with the author's help. it has overlap with other rbls but about a 10% differential.
Regards, KAM "Warren Togami Jr." <[email protected]> wrote: >1) What is blocking the release process of 3.3.2? > >2) MSPIKE (previously named ANBREP) has proven consistently in weekly >masschecks since before the release of 3.3.0 to have excellent >performance. >Would you folks consider accepting it as default in 3.3.2, or would you >prefer waiting until 3.4.0 to enable a new DNSBL by default? > >Warren
