https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #25 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2010-12-29 15:02:23 UTC --- > Btw the njabl rules use deep parsing, might be useful to test with > lastexternal > too. This is a good point, but we can't do an apples to apples comparison because the existing rules are "reuse" and based on existing tagged mail. But we know that this can only reduce the already tiny hit rate even further. > can we please close this "bug" as it's clearly not a bug. AXB, I have great respect for you, but I have to strongly disagree with you on this. Even your own numbers in Comment #11 support my position. > Regarding FP's I have to go right now, I'll look deeper into this (if they are largely due to deep parsing or not) when I get back. Meanwhile does anyone have any comment on the questions in Comment #20? I am willing to defer this if this is really an issue of "we don't make changes like this between major releases". -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
