https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5655
--- Comment #6 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2011-01-07 11:27:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > It's not just that the tokens don't make it to the top 5 hammy/spammy list. In > my experience they never show-up at all in spamassassin -D bayes. Sometimes > the > ASN debug appears before tokenization, sometimes after, it seems to make no > difference. Indeed that is true. The ASN plugin runs at a priority 0 as most other rules, and the BAYES runs even earlier: 60_shortcircuit.cf: priority BAYES_99 -400 so I don't see how meta-information provided by the ASN plugin could contribute to bayes tokens, unless bayes priority is moved up to run late, or ASN priority pushed down very early, earlier than -400. Btw, the meta-information provided by my yesterday's change (previous posting) does at least end up in *learned* tokens, as bayes learning comes late. So, as it stands now, the ASN is not useful for bayes, the documentation is misleading. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
