IADB was replaced with SuretyMail. I'm not sure we can detangle that
one is a replacement for the other:
http://www.isipp.com/others.html
Regards,
KAM
On 1/13/2011 6:19 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/felicity/70_iadb.cf?revision=789457&view=co
# we already check for this
#header RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted',
'^127.2.255.101$')
#describe RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS IADB: Sender participates in
Habeas program
#tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS net nice
# we already check for this
#header RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER
eval:check_rbl_sub('iadb-firsttrusted', '^127.2.255.102$')
#describe RCVD_IN_AIDB_BONDEDSENDER IADB: Sender participates in
Bonded Sender program
#tflags RCVD_IN_IADB_BONDEDSENDER net nice
Does this mean that IADB syndicates ReturnPath's "safe" and
"certified" lists? How up-to-date is this syndication?
I ask, because if they are kept up-to-date, we could eliminate two DNS
queries per mail and reuse this existing DNS query for these two rules.
http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/usage-limits-of-spamassassin-network.html
This further matters because ReturnPath advertises a limit of 100k
queries per today, while IADB seems to have no query limit and they
have free data feeds.
Warren
