+1 here as well with the sandbox clarification. I'll add that to the wiki. Regards, KAM
"Justin Mason" <[email protected]> wrote: >"tflags nopublish" gets my vote. > >--j. > >On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:02, Warren Togami Jr. <[email protected]> >wrote: >> On 01/16/2011 11:52 PM, Justin Mason wrote: >>> >>> BTW, I am entirely in favour of changing other people's sandbox >rules, >>> if they are making it into production, haven't been touched in >several >>> months and are likely unmaintained. (It might be friendly to mail >>> them to notify that you're making the change, however, but that's up >>> to you, ymmv.) >>> >>> --j. >> >> In this case, do you feel nopublish or 73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf >would be >> better? During 2009 I had a similar prejudiced rule against .cn >URI's. I >> felt it was inappropriate to push it even as informational in >production so >> I made it nopublish. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 >> What about this issue? How do we force a sa-update push? I'm >guessing it >> is a matter of logging into zones and manually running a script? >> >> Warren >>
