On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 04:15 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:35 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> > I am not sure who "smf" is, but are they aware that "test rules" without
> > "tflags nopublish" could possibly be auto-promoted with a score they
> > don't expect. Scores in the sandbox below are ignored. We don't want a
> > repeat of the FSL_RU_URL issue.
>
> Getting *cough* late here, and I'm terribly tired...
Argh. That's what you get for searching at the wrong end. Right after
turning off the machine, and heading to bed...
That's Steve Freegard, a recent addition to the committers. :)
Anyway, I stand to my recommendation to just add the tflags. This is
something we all need to get into the habit.
> Warren, IMHO, please feel free to add the tflags necessary. Yes, inside
> someone else's sandbox. I guess the recent discussion about rules
> possibly spreading unintended didn't reach everyone. Although it won't
> right now, as we know -- but the corpora being under-limit is another
> topic, unrelated to best practices. Adding tflags nopublish is not
> intrusive anyway, and warranted in this case, I guess.
>
> Definitely, good catch, Warren.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
