On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 21/03/2011 10:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 21/03/2011 10:34 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >
> > > We're back above the corpus thresholds for nightly sa-update
> > > updates.
> > > Yay!
> >
> > And the update that just went out still contains the PILL_PRICE
> > rules...
> >
> > Maybe tomorrow. Dang.
>
> No, it'll take a week, I think. A side-effect of only doing
> net-enabled checks once a week... I think it uses the rules from the
> oldest version, but I can't remember without looking.
I don't think so. The one that just went out was for commit 1083377 and
that was a regular nightly masscheck. If the updates were only for
Ooops... I was looking at 1083705 which is for trunk.
weekly -net masschecks then how did we get two on consecutive days?
(Unless somebody pushed the second...)
There's an update every day, but the set-1 results only change once a week,
so I think the rules that are published are tied to set-1.... or something
like that. Basically you're screwed for a week between net-checks if a bad
rule gets out.
Well, we'll know for sure tomorrow when the update based on a commit after
I removed the PILL_PRICE rules goes out.
Dang.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The third basic rule of firearms safety:
Keep your booger hook off the bang switch!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 days until the M1911 is 100 years old - and still going strong!
