https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6580
--- Comment #7 from John Hardin <[email protected]> 2011-05-02 13:36:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry I couldn't post the body, but the rest of the e-mail was sensitive. That's okay, an HTML body is easy to fake up. > I would think that the majority of SA users have basic DNS checks for SPF and > DKIM enabled?? After some non-midnight-oil thought, I've decided the adding !SPF_HIT and !DKIM_VALID don't really drag in net dependencies. They won't act to suppress FPs in a non-net install, and will help if network is enabled. I will make a pass through my rules adding them where appropriate. In this specific case the phone-to-phone avoidance does work, and isn't net-based. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
