https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490
--- Comment #3 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[email protected]> 2011-05-03 05:06:19 UTC --- Does this "SPF_NONE" patch handle DNS sub-system failure? The reason SPF_NONE was not "included from the beginning of the module" as it "should have been" is because, at least at the time, there was no way to distinguish between no DNS response to an SPF check (for whatever reason) and there being no SPF record. I'm -1 on any soluton which cannot handle this distinction. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
