Disable rfc-ignorant.org
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
Needs 3 votes.
(Summary needs "[review]" added.)
Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score of 0.0.
Need closing:
Add a rules conditional function has(), similar to can()
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6581
Patch committed.
And the 17 open bugs targeted for 3.3.2 with "[review]" in their summary,
which I believe means they're just waiting for a vote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?list_id=177;short_desc=%5Breview%5D;query_format=advanced;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;target_milestone=3.3.2
6558 - Ready to Commit
6241 - Ready to Commit at Justin's discretion
6336 - Needs one vote from someone other than Mark or myself
6375 - ""
6376 - ""
6377 - ""
6382 - ""
6418 - ""
6454 - ""
6468 - ""
6566 - ""
6447 - ""
6403 - Karsten, can you weigh in on this one. To me, I don't like the
patch and I'm trending towards INVALID / WONTFIX because it seems to be
an implementation issue more so than an SA bug combined with a
workaround for Google. However, if you say it's good, google is such a
large provider, I would vote +1.
5491 - ready to commit
6229 - Retargeted to 3.4.0
5924 - What exact
5924 - Out of my area of expertise and I'm really not certain WHAT we
are voting on ;-) If you need a +1, it sounds like a good plain to have
a cross-signed offical SA keyring because it's held up being able to
release as noted a few days ago.
Regards,
KAM
