On Mon, 9 May 2011, smallrat wrote:
I wanted to ask, if someone knows how to make hit-frequencies and also
mass-check, to take into account the increased values of rules.
For examlpe, I have "score bayes_99 (2)" in 50_scores.cf, and I want
./hit-frequencies, and also ./mass-check to deal with this correctly.
How should I do that?
To what end? The score doesn't determine whether or not the rule hits on a
given message. How are the scores on the rules causing hit-frequencies and
mass-check to "incorrectly" deal with things? What do you think should
happen instead? Please describe what you perceive to be the problem in a
little more detail...
Is it just the display of the rule's score in the output, and this is
purely a cosmetic issue?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Men by their constitutions are naturally divided in to two parties:
1. Those who fear and distrust the people and wish to draw all
powers from them into the hands of the higher classes. 2. Those who
identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them,
cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe, although not
the most wise, depository of the public interests.
-- Thomas Jefferson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
151 days since the first successful private orbital launch (SpaceX)
