https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6353
--- Comment #24 from AXB <[email protected]> 2011-05-11 10:41:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > > Giving this a review since there are lots to choose. Feel free to vote on > > MISSING_FROM score if you feel like it or have different opinion on the > > NOTLD > > rule. > > If you mean this one: > header T_MISSING_FROM From =~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset: UNSET] > > we already have rules: > header __HAS_RCVD exists:Received > header __HAS_MESSAGE_ID exists:Message-Id > header __HAS_DATE exists:Date > header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject > (which really test for existence of a header field, not just > comparing it to some magic reserved string) > > so why not add a: > header __HAS_FROM exists:From > > and than can have a: > meta T_MISSING_FROM !__HAS_FROM +1 for the meta -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
