https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490
--- Comment #34 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-05-11 15:42:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > There are lots of things that are entirely legitimate that SA penalizes for > (the rules for no brackets in To: come to mind), but that doesn't mean they > don't usefully correlate to spamminess. I think SPF_NONE should be added and > it's score floated, unless it is shown to have a problematic rate of false > positives. Just like everything else. Good argument. A small 0.1 score to start encouraging people to use SPF isn't going to ruffle my feathers. I recommend you add the rule for masscheck to see how things pan out. I was simply trying to implement the consensus that was clear in the ticket to complete the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
