https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6484
Darxus <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #24 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-05-26 18:55:39 UTC --- D. Stussy, can you give me an example of a DNSRBL that is returning values for IPv4 2.0.0.0/8 for IPv6 queries in 2000/16? I understand the problem. I'm wondering about digging up some evidence and talking to the folks who did the RFC: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5782#section-2.4 I think a better solution is to add something to the IPv6 records. So instead of [reversed IP].[zone], it's something like [reversed IP].v6.[zone]. Looks like this should be closed: It's committed to trunk, which it's targeted for. Unless somebody wants to re-target it for 3.3.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
