https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6613
--- Comment #5 from D. Stussy <[email protected]> 2011-06-03 20:39:19 UTC --- eval:check_rbl_uhandled is an interesting idea, especially for "mass checks" as it could alert us to the deployment of a new kind of entry (or result code) in these "combined" DNS databases. I assume such would require: 1) An A-RR that is affirmatively returned (so as to exclude timeout, etc.), and 2) A flag being [re-]set when another check_rbl_sub matches. We would have to guarentee that _unhandled() runs AFTER all _sub()s (or at least, after at least one sub which matches). Currently, this could be simulated with a meta rule [per DNS list]; correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
