https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6618
--- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-06-15 23:31:09 UTC --- > > Figured out the difference, try it with -d and you'll get the same lack of > > useful error. I'm 99.9% sure this is an Invalid bug report. With -d, the information is logged to syslog which would be appropriate for a daemon. Without -d, is there a specific case that you can point out that should be resolved? However, it seems we could use some additions to Dependency.pm to test for required/optional binaries such as gpg. I'll attach a patch with my first pass at doing so. The test_version subroutine might be reinventing the wheel or doing things very much the hard way so if anyone has any input, I'm all ears. Darxus and others, can you remove gpg from your path (or change your path) and test this patch? Would be good if you can play with the required/recommended versions and test as well with gpg in the path. All you have to do for a test is perl Makefile.PL [email protected] The goal of this patch is to prompt that the optional gpg is not installed and this is required for sa-update to function. It also gives a framework built off the existing MODULES and OPTIONAL_MODULES functionality for binaries. Regards, KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
