https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490
--- Comment #47 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-06-24 15:29:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #46) > Re - SPF: I simply find it ironic that an anti-spam oriented organization > with > such a product as SA wouldn't take steps to validate mail it sends out as > non-forged. SPF seems to be the easiest of all (DK/DKIM and PGP so far) to > implement. > > Personally, I assign an SA score of zero to SPF=PASS and positive scores to > all > the other non-error results detectable (fail, softfail, neutral, and none). > However, for SPF=NONE, the score I assigned has not once tipped the > classification scale into the spammy range, although it is enough to trip my > threshold for attaching an SA report to mail. > > This is a matter of principle. Nothing more. Mostly it's the fate of a cobbler's kid. Since INFRA has plenty to do, I'm choosing not to saddle them with the requests since there is no gain, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
