https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6560
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-06-27 22:06:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Daryl provided a generated but un-released sa-update for testing this: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-dev/201105.mbox/%[email protected]%3E > > Warren thought he tested it, but was apparently looking at the wrong tarball > (said in IRC today). Kevin also tested it, but presumably didn't specifically > look for the SEM rules that were being a problem. > > (In case anybody else has been thinking "Wait, didn't we test this?") As they were flagged as T_ which is what the cf file said to do, I wouldn't have flagged it as wrong. A few DNS queries don't bug me and it won't swing ham/spam scores excep by almost negligible amounts. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
