https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6645
--- Comment #27 from [email protected] 2011-08-13 13:03:32 UTC --- Don't think that anyone still uses Exchange 5.0, but I don't know how other servers behave regarding X-... headers. Don't know which distros ship with qmail-scanner (at least there are some wikis about installing it (see The Linux Documentation Project or a entry on google how to install it on Ubuntu). If people install it themselves it is much more probably that they won't be running the current version ... If you want to get to know a distro where it is in the package repository (because you want confirm the bug) you could try Gentoo. --- I want to remember you of two interesting pages telling something about qmail/qmail-scanner and spamassassin: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInQmailWithQmailScanner "SpamAssassin can be integrated into qmail system-wide using qmail-scanner." http://spamassassin.apache.org/ "Flexible: SpamAssassin ... can be used on a wide variety of email systems including ... qmail" If you search in your bug database you will find an entry (not from me) that qmail-scanner is often used with qmail. Strange that spamassassin's marketing guys are advertising spamassassin's use with qmail, but that people on spamassassin's bugzilla don't want to fix spamassassin to completely support qmail-scanner, which integrates spamassassin into qmail (especially as it wouldn't be a great change). Maybe you should discuss this with your own marketing people (and maybe with QA why support is incomplete). BTW: You seem to haven't fixed the download for the sha1-signatures for the rules tarball reported in comment 19 (you don't have any component seeming appropriate for a separate bug report for broken links). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
