https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4691
Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #33 from Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> 2011-09-07 05:29:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > > This should significantly reduce scan time, especially if a script regularly > drills into the timing logs and reduces the scope of the more > resource-intensive rules (incrementally until it affects the hit stats). A 512kB limit will not significantly reduce anything. After all, how many mails are bigger than that? Have you seen my tests? Even a 30kB limit was only 7% faster given enough corpus to test. https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6582 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
