> On 2011-09-13 22:23, [email protected] wrote: > > We waste so much time backporting to the last branch. And trunk has been > > incredibly stable. I hate to see releases that aren't taken from trunk, > > seems like a waste of time and effort. > > for once I agree with Darxus :) > There are a few usefull additions/fixes in 3.4 trunk which won't ever > get backported and it would be a pity to have to wait
Yes, no need to waste effort on 3.3.3, there are no critical problems with 3.3.2. Axb wrote: > I'd +1 to cut a "beta1" out of trunk. Kevin wrote: > I'd like to make a goal to get sa-update a lot cleaner and ipv6 native > release which I'm working on infrastructure for and call it 3.4.x. I agree, fixing the sa-update's problem of repeated downloads when some intermediate stage fails should be considered a blocker for 3.4.0. Making sa-update IPv6 capable would be highly desirable, now that Kevin has provided a dual-stack mirror (thanks Kevin!). A major release is a good opportunity for both of these changes. I still need to fix one issue with AskDNS plugin... Mark
