https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6668
--- Comment #2 from AXB <[email protected]> 2011-10-03 12:58:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > ##{ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_ABUSE ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval > > > > ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval > > header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_ABUSE eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted', > > '^127\.0\.\d+\.255$') > > describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_ABUSE You are using a DNS server that is > > placing > > too high a load on the DNSWL.org DNS servers without a subscription, please > > see > > https://subscription.dnswl.org/ > > tflags RCVD_IN_DNSWL_ABUSE nice net > > endif > > ##} RCVD_IN_DNSWL_ABUSE ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval > > I would personally veto this immediately. We are not an advertising service > for RBLs. > > If an RBL is submitted for inclusion for SA, it should not have policies that > would affect anything but the most extreme cases. Any URLs should point to an > SA page such as a wiki letting them know to disable the rules. > > > Also, I think it's really irresponsible for SpamAssassin to expose users to > > this kind of punitive activity without actually warning them of the usage > > thresholds of the services involved, as Warren lists here: > > http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/usage-limits-of-spamassassin-network.html > > I agree. What RBLs have this issue and I will immediate work to disable them > in a default SA installation for the 3.4.0 release? Warren forgot URIBL.com in his list - afaik, also has a limit of 300k queries/day which, like the others is usually enough for the average site. IF the BL query limits hit ISPs/service providers/huge corps they're freeriding on (in most cases) donated resources and being cheap so nobody should be surprised if their queries are blocked/filtered -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
