https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6678
--- Comment #3 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2011-10-19 22:12:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > These certainly look like *real* replies, as in it's a conversation where one > user has replied to another. Subjects all begin with Re: > Yet I have other examples of replies from the same user with the same X-Mailer > relayed through the same ISP that do have the References header. Can you tell if this was the first "reply", or already a replied-to mail? Asking, because we most likely can rule out the SMTP relay stripping the header, according to comment 2. The difference would be the user manually adding the Re: prefix, or just copying the Subject verbatim. Either case, it looks like the sender did not actually reply, but composed the message some other way. Like the reverse of the thread-hijacking "reply, and prune subject and body to get a 'clean' message". Users have done stranger things, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of your samples turn out to be copied content from a reply into a newly composed message... Or maybe some "helpful" third-party tool used, that hooks into OE6. Anyway, it would be an edge case, and single rules FP'ing does happen... From your comments it certainly doesn't seem to be a bad rule systematically triggering falsely. > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 > tests=[BAYES_00=-5, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
