https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6386
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-11-08 17:59:13 UTC --- > I realize this problem is critically linked to fixing our ability to add new > masscheck accounts, but I'd like to try to get consensus on what the ham age > limit should be changed to. Recommend we visit this again in 4 months to give time to get more mass checkers. I am working through the backlog and got one person at least their password yesterday because they are a committer. But having a specific age implies that spammers will simply be able to use their old tricks again after X number of months or years. So once promoted, always promoted because a bit of an interesting discussion. Perhaps make a "hyper-efficient" ruleset for those that are interested in saving cycles? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
