https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6700
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-11-14 22:20:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Seems to be deliberate. > > See PerMsgStatus.pm get_uri_detail_list(), which deliberately harvests domains > from DK/DKIM headers. Thanks. Good catch. That explains the behavior I'm seeing. This is undocumented and outside the scope of the rule type. OK, so going back as far as 3.2.5, the uri rule apparently purposefully also adds the domain from the DKIM/DomainKey Signature header. So should the documentation be changed or the rule uri parsing? To me, it seems VERY hackish that the only headers for URI rules are domainkeys/dkim. Regards, KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
