https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6704
Darxus <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Summary|[review] Add /debian/ back |[review] Add /debian/ to |to MANIFEST |MANIFEST --- Comment #3 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-11-17 17:44:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just to clarify, /debian/ was never in a previous release that I can find. It > was added to support launchpad builds in trunk in Mid-May. Oh, thanks. I thought it had been in the MANIFEST previously, but I confirmed your right, it's not in previous releases. (In reply to comment #2) > Did you carefully re-read that thread before filing this bug? Yes, a few times. > Even the debian maintainer Noah Meyerhans was in favor of dropping it > entirely, > rather than getting it synced, since it won't help to keep it fresh in the > future. It'll help people who, for some reason, feel a need to install from a tarball on a Debian based system. > I won't even consider this, unless the debian maintainers are in favor of it. > > Other than that, there are quite a few -1 on distro specific stuff in the > referenced thread. Could you tell me your reason for objecting? Other than just other people's opinions, which I'm not sure I agree with your interpretation of. It's isolated in its own separate /debian/ directory, nice and tidy, and I'm maintaining it. As far as I can tell there is no harm, and there can be some benefit. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
