https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6668
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #19 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-12-11 15:45:58 UTC --- As noted by Darxus, this is PURPOSEFUL behavior to return true statements for what they consider abuse. "DNSWL announced this behavior here: http://www.dnswl.org/news/archives/24-Abusive-use-of-dnswl.org-infrastructure-enforcing-limits.html"; If they had chosen to add a time-delay, block answers or return a false answer that did not trigger the rules, I would support it. 1 - Do we have any other RBLs enabled by default that return False Positives once a threshold is hit? 2 - IMO they need to be disabled by default -OR- documented far stronger. Unless someone steps up with some ideas, I'm going to disable DNSWL by default very shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
