On 12/12/2011 2:14 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6400#c27

Hey folks, any comments on this? Here I bring up some very serious issues regarding the automatic scoring methodology of Mailspike and why we shouldn't add more whitelists.
I read it and it in general I disagreed with the whitelist part of your statement. Of course, one of my niches in anti-spam is focusing on pro-ham stuff. Too many spam fighters focus on the spam and not the ham IMO.

But I also don't see that masscheck shouldn't test whitelists because there is no shortcircuiting and the goal is to take all the scores, positive or negative, and create a rule scoreset that gets a score of 5.0 to within accepted FP limits.

And I like the debate on high-level issues but I'd like to get specifics for that ticket as well. High-level for me is good for dev list and low-level specifics are good for bugzilla.

Right now, the scores would be set in 50_scores.cf so they would not float and we have consensus for 3.4.0. We have a veto for everything below 3.4.

So I'm committing rules to trunk and believe we can take things from there. If you have live score recommendations to consider, I'd love to hear them but my scores are based on personal tests and Joao's feedback.

Regards,
KAM


Reply via email to