https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6668
--- Comment #28 from Matthias Leisi <[email protected]> 2011-12-12 20:33:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > Overall, the efficacy of DNSWL outside of the FP scores is well established > > and that's not a barrier to the re-enabling of the scores. It should be noted that the policy contested in this bug does not cause FPs. It does cause FNs for a small number of users (where other attempts to rectify an unaccepted situation failed). On the other hand, removing the rules will lead to a higher risk of FPs for 99.something % of users. > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg69546.html > Well established based on what? Has anyone looked at the statistics to prove > that this situation has not changed? Well established based on http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/. While the stats have a lot of fluctuation which makes it sometimes hard to interpret individual data points, it generally shows the "usefulness" of dnswl.org rules/data. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
