I'm seeing a bunch that don't, in what I have from sa-update.
My impression is that all net rules should use "reuse" unless there
is a very good reason not to, since accuracy at time of receipt can be
significantly different from accuracy at the time masscheck is run.
$ grep -h ^reuse * | awk '{print $2}' > ~/tmp/reuserules.txt
$ grep -h "tflags.*net" * | grep -vf ~/tmp/reuserules.txt | awk '{print $2}'
__RFC_IGNORANT_ENVFROM
RCVD_IN_MAPS_RBL
RCVD_IN_MAPS_DUL
RCVD_IN_MAPS_RSS
RCVD_IN_MAPS_OPS
RCVD_IN_MAPS_NML
__RCVD_IN_IADB
RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED
DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL
__DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_ANY
DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_UNKNOWN
DCC_REPUT_00_12
DCC_REPUT_13_19
DCC_REPUT_70_89
DCC_REPUT_90_94
DCC_REPUT_95_98
DCC_REPUT_99_100
DKIM_SIGNED
DKIM_VALID
DKIM_VALID_AU
DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN
DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD
DKIM_ADSP_ALL
DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_LOW
DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED
DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_HIGH
__RESIGNER1
__RESIGNER2
DKIM_VERIFIED
DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME
DKIM_POLICY_SIGNALL
DKIM_POLICY_TESTING
URIBL_DBL_SPAM
URIBL_DBL_REDIR
URIBL_DBL_ERROR
USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
FROM_MISSP_DKIM
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
RCVD_IN_CSS
RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED
RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE
URIBL_RHS_DOB
__SPF_FULL_PASS
__SPF_RANDOM_SENDER
Some of the DKIM stuff doesn't need "reuse" because it won't change between
receipt and masscheck, but is there a reason not to use it?
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM is actually included in that output, but it's commented
out.
--
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed --
and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless
series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H. L. Mencken
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
