On 01/29, [email protected] wrote: > Huh, a fun thing about this one is nobody's corpus is conspicuously > missing. Which seems likely to be more problematic to fix. I guess
I only fed my script data from 2011. How awesome of me. I believe this is more likely to be accurate: 20120128 Missing ham-net-llanga - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-darxus-trap - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-darxus - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-bernie-mix - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-bernie-it_batt - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-bernie-fsf - last seen 20120121. Missing ham-net-axb-ham - last seen 20111119. Missing ham-net-axb-generic - last seen 20111119. Missing ham-net-axb-fraud - last seen 20111119. Missing ham-net-axb-brasil - last seen 20111119. Missing ham-net-kgolding - last seen 20111015. Missing ham-net-dos - last seen 20111015. Missing ham-net-nbebout - last seen 20110528. And... masscheck is still running on my machine. Huh. So it's quite likely that the reason my scrape last week said we were under threshold, and then somehow ended up over threshold, was because my masscheck submission happened a day late. And that's happening again. -- "Am I a man who dreamed I was a butterfly, or am I a butterfly who is dreaming I am a man?" - Chuang Tsu, ~350 BC http://www.ChaosReigns.com
