https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6693
--- Comment #3 from Ned Slider <[email protected]> 2012-02-06 15:54:47 UTC --- Another FP today: Received: from host86-156-197-239.range86-156.btcentralplus.com ([86.156.197.239] helo=userv259ifke46) by mail11.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) due to incorrect termination of __FSL_HELO_USER_3 rule. Is anyone going to pick this up and run with it or am I wasting my time? I'm happy to offer whatever assistance is required. When implemented correctly, it is safe to deploy these rules as header checks at the MTA level and reject spam outright with them so they have the potential to be extremely high scoring spam indicators in SA. They just need a little fine tuning. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
