https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6759
--- Comment #3 from D. Stussy <[email protected]> 2012-02-19 20:05:45 UTC --- As far as the addition of the semicolon to the end of the regex goes, why do we need a real-world example if such is perfectly legal given the ABNF syntax in RFC 5321? If the "id" and "for" clauses are omitted, the semicolon will indeed trail the "with" clause's parameter. However, as a semicolon followed by a date is always required per the syntax (cf. RFC 5322), the "$" to terminate the string should NEVER occur in a properly formatted message. Even if we're testing a wrapped header without unwrapping it, the semicolon will appear BEFORE the newline+tab wrapping the date on the next line. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
