On 03/11, Axb wrote: > > Guys, > > At the moment, after last sa-update: > > score RCVD_IN_XBL 0 0.724 0 0.375 # n=0 n=2 > > is amazingly low. > > last net masscheck shows > 0 43.3599 0.0133 1.000 0.97 0.00 RCVD_IN_XBL > (http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120310-r1299162-n/RCVD_IN_XBL/detail) > (darxus & llanga corpus poisoned?)
One of my two is a notification from livejournal.com that my girlfriend posted to her lj. The other is a post to a yahoo group for a local goth club night, to which I have been subscribed for a while. > as the second best ranking rule, shouldn't this this score be raised > quite a bit, to at least 1.7? There are a number of reasons for the score generator to come up with this result. > score RCVD_IN_SBL 0 2.596 0 0.141 # n=0 n=2 > with a ranking of 0.85 > > Cannot imagine what HAM is hitting SBL unless its IPs listed due to > 419s or llanga & darxus' corpus have snowshow in their ham corpus > > (See http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120310-r1299162-n/RCVD_IN_SBL/detail) I have 29 hams that hit this. In reverse chronological order: Looks like 18 are livejournal.com. 11 are notifications that there were updates to the thread http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53001 which I had subscribed to. So, all of my hams hitting both of these rules are legit hams, where the blacklists had false positives. I am very confident that none of them were just exquisitely faked. -- "Force, my friends, is violence; the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived." - Michael Ironside, Starship Troopers http://www.ChaosReigns.com
