https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6745
--- Comment #13 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 5052 [details] > Avoid logging and any complex operations in a sigchld handler > > Would something like the attached patch still do the job > while avoiding the problem? > > (My brief testing under perl 5.14.2 looks alright even when prefork > is adjusting the number of child processes, but I'm not running spamd > in production, so more stress testing is appreciated). It's been a few weeks so perhaps commit to trunk and let's get more production testing done? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
